A question for you, gentle reader: Think please before you were the owner of a pretty little house, surrounded by a garden, all may have already paid off. Enjoy your idyll somewhere in the country and enjoy your life. That is your right, because also you have put your assets in the estate, and your parents and in-laws may have also zugebuttert strong. So far, so good. Since
would burst into the news in the immediate vicinity of a nuclear power plant was planned, but as a bomb or not? Would you let such a newsgroup cold, or would you immediately think about moving out of the area, and the possible far? Now you try
time to sell a house in the neighborhood of a nuclear power plant is being built: if you are lucky it is acquired by the chief engineer of the work, and you will financially with a black eye. Less fortunate contemporaries just sell for half the market value of an older couple without children, which assumes that it will move to the completion of the nuclear power plant anyway in the nursing home.
that people will be reluctant to submit to the production of the allegedly "clean form of energy nuclear power" in their neighborhood, has a good reason: Nuclear power is just not the clean energy, as it was sold to us for decades, but it is by far the dirtiest form to get our living room lights to burn.
Just read the following study:
http://www.umweltinstitut.org/radioaktivitat/krebs-um-atomkraftwerke/leukamie-um-atomkraftwerke-keine-entwarnung-fur-krummel-55.html
We can therefore in short, see that the number is increased acute lymphocytic leukemia in the vicinity of nuclear facilities by a factor of 3.4. A great place to raise children, is not it?
factor is that the final disposal of waste is the beam more than unclear. Many generations after us will have to think about how they of us left behind radioactive waste for now are to manage.
http://www.spiegel.de/wissenschaft/mensch/0, 1518,561832,00. Html
Immediate nuclear power? - No, of course not. BUT:
● Research and development of solar energy with all our available forces is the need of the hour. Thereto should be involved all the high-tech countries. It should be based space programs or arms races to be postponed. Who is able to deliver tanks to Iraq, is also capable of his undeniable creative force in Solar research invest. We should always keep one fact in mind: The sun is
in every half an hour as much energy to the Earth as the whole of humanity consumes in a year. The energy is thus effectively on the road. This circumstance not to use for the benefit of mankind and the environment would be nothing but a huge stupidity. ● Instead of paying
high EU subsidies to farmers aside, all the appropriate fields for the same money will be leased by them and fitted with solar panels. Once in this way the output of a nuclear power station is reached, the oldest defuse this time bomb finally, that is irretrievably for closure. So it can go until the final game with the nuclear fires of the past.
● The course important argument of the solar opponents, namely the dependence on the instantaneous solar radiation, could be undermined in two ways: First,
southern Europe and North Africa could be a center of European energy Verso laid. It also involves the question of the development of solar hydrogen technology. Weather-related power valleys of solar systems could be compensated by hydrogen power plants.
So there is much to do! Given the fact that the currently operating nuclear power plants now not even be younger and their replacement cost is billions is to inspect at all why you should go with the same money is not entirely new ground.
